<aside> <img src="/icons/code_gray.svg" alt="/icons/code_gray.svg" width="40px" /> TL;DR
</aside>
OrbisDB will provide a migration plan and work on different path (simple vs advanced) to offer a clear pathforward for ComposeDB builders. We should have different approach based on organizations + volume of data, but also based on their technical set up (self-hosting? managed via Hirenodes?
Timeline:
To be discussed/confirmed
| Project names | Project detail
Are they building an SDK? a frontend app? a backend app?
| ComposeDB Status
Status of development, active or not?
| Mainnet | Self-hosting
*Where do they host their node? Hirenodes? If no: Details about their own server hosting*
| ComposeDB Lib
Do they use ComposeDB libraries for write (probably yes)? If yes: Mutation examples? If no: How do they write data?
| Indexing
Do they use ComposeDB GraphQL endpoint for reads (probably yes)?
| GraphQL Provider
Which GraphQL provider they are using? (e.g Apollo? Yoga?)
| Postgres Instance
Do they have an existing Postgres database?
|
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Passport | Front-end App + SDK | Active ✅ | ✅ | Hirenodes? TBC | ✅ | ✅ | | ✅ |
| Oamo | Front-end App + soon SDK? | Active ✅ | ✅ | Self-hosted? TBC | | | | |
| Akasha | SDK | Active? | Testnet | | ✅ | ✅ | Apollo | ✅ |
| Index.Network | SDK + Backend? | Active ✅ | ✅ | Self-hosted | ✅ | ✅ | | ✅ |
| ZUCITY | | | | | | | | |
| Iggy Social | | | | | | | | |
| Latteral (Coordination.network) | | | | | | | | |
| Molecule | | Interested in OrbisDB | | | | | | |
| Plurality | | Interested in OrbisDB | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
It will be extremely helpful to understand precisely what is the current status of ComposeDB builders to offer a targeted migration/compatibility approach for each of them based on their technical stack.